These provisions apply to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, whether or not the transaction occurred previous to its promulgation. Read more
It is additionally important to note that granting of seniority into a civil servant without the actual size of service virtually violates the complete service structure like a civil servant inducted in Grade 17 by claiming these types of benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher quality, which is neither the intention in the law nor from the equity. Read more
In addition, it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and 120 from the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, as well as role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as being a legally acknowledged conviction. Read more
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
These past decisions are called "case legislation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—is definitely the principle by which judges are bound to this kind of past decisions, drawing on set up judicial authority to formulate their positions.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically lead to exoneration from departmental charges based within the same factual grounds. Even though a writ under Article 199 is out there in specific limited situations, it's generally not the suitable remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-take a look at witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't influence the department of his/her innocence.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it truly is unclear the way it applies to any supplied situation, typically rendering judgments based over the intent of lawmakers and the circumstances of your case at hand. These kinds of decisions become a guide for upcoming similar cases.
Only the written opinions in the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals are routinely readily available. Decisions of the decrease (trial) courts aren't generally published or dispersed.
five hundred,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) Just about every plus the same shall be saved within the police station to your effect that no harm shall be caused to the petitioners. 5. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair for the offender along with the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect more info on it.
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to your tradition that the reader should have the ability to deduce the logic from the decision along with the statutes.[four]
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the realized counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession in the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this element for interim custody of the subject premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a effectively-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.